I believe that antitheses (quarrels) have a constant order, development really requires them. If the antitheses seem incorrect, it only tells you that the theses are hidden. Theses must be made open so that antitheses can be properly aligned. The stigma of the closed society — hidden theses — takes us to unknown roads and under unknown guidance. The accuracy of the "map" requires a broad perspective, in which case all those who have disputed must take into account that we stay on the road and that we find our destination with the help of the map. -There-? Unfortunately, our destination has never been revealed by anyone anywhere. Do we know exactly where we are going? At least I don't know. However, I know that on this journey to something, Greenpeace offers the controversies that development and map accuracy require. Disagreements and reminders about environmental protection must be taken into account, despite the fact that we know nothing about the future. To know something about the future would require a premise of the absolute regularity of the world, so that we could know the future from what has already happened. We would thus justify an inductive conclusion. When we do not know the future, in the eliminative induction, the last remissions to protect life and the planet must be removed last, all other premises are secondary.